Difference: 20152710MSciPhotometryLab2 (6 vs. 7)

Revision 727 Oct 2015 - DavidHadden

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="StewartBoogertPhotometry2015"
Initial Investigations
Line: 20 to 20
  hour_comparison_zoom_correct.png
Added:
>
>
In the first image, a full comparison of the 1 hour exposures for different angles are seen, and within many bright patches are seen in identical pixel positions for both. Although they are hard to see looking at a static image, so a zoomed in region is shown below, showing an almost identical, intensely triggered group of pixels in the same position. Many of these are seen, and are now shown without a doubt to be due to faults in the CCD chip, although it is not currently understood whether or not this is a prominent affect for stellar observations.

Another feature no longer seen is the streaks seen before, which is perhaps because they are very infrequent events, which are covered up by the background for exposures of this magnitude. This would perhaps point to them being random cosmic rays, or radiative decays, which strike the CCD chip at random positions, so do not create a large effect for longer exposures.

 -- DavidHadden - 27 Oct 2015

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="zero_second_exposures.zip" attr="" comment="" date="1445944596" name="zero_second_exposures.zip" path="zero_second_exposures.zip" size="6016783" user="zxap012" version="1"
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2018 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback