Difference: Atf2LwLogBook20130225QuadScanAnalysis ( vs. 1)

Revision 125 Feb 2013 - LaurieNevay

Line: 1 to 1

20130225 Quad Scan Analysis

Previous quad scans took a lot of time and don't provide the clearest picture. During the previous quad scan on shift on the 20130222, the following procedure was used:

Name Samples Steps Range (um) Average Time Provides?
Quick vertical scan 10 5 20 44s vertical centring
Detailed horizontal scan 40 20 2000 11m33s horizontal centring and horizontal size
Nonlinear vertical scan 50 30 150 8m40s vertical size

  • Typically 25 minutes per magnet current with 5 minutes changing, minimising background again (post ip) and ensuring don't loose signal
  • 3A steps, 9 points measured

Despite increasing the chamber speed to 50um/s, the horizontal scan still takes the most time and with a typical uncertainty of +-10um on the horizontal size (fitting to be improved..) it's still not the most accurate.

  • The time for this whole process needs to be reduced
  • The horizontal uncertainty ideally needs to be less
  • Ideally, 2 or 3 vertical scans would be repeated at each current for statistics.


  • OTR images provide horizontal sizes with a lower uncertainty than the laser-wire scans and can be done much quicker at the end.
  • Use the OTR images for horizontal information and do only a small horizontal scan for centring.
  • Perform 2 non-linear scans at each location
  • Optimise non-linear scan points to reduced number of points required for the same uncertainty or even lower uncertainty


Settings just to customise this page

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback