|
META TOPICPARENT |
name="WebHome" |
-- PaulHallam - 18 Oct 2013
Aims |
|
- Use Python to analyse these dark frames via Histogram plots and plots of column mean and standerd deviation, to determine if the pixels follow a Poisson distribution.
- To compare my results regarding dark frames with Chris Haynes and Ryan Cheale's results.
List of Potential Targets |
|
< < |
- Gamma Cassiopeia - Variable Star (Gamma Cassiopeia Variable), magnitude variation 1.5 - 3.0, period Unknown, Good Visibility - Poor Choice
|
|
- Delta Cephei - Variable Star (Cephid Variable), magnitude variation 3.5 - 4.4, period 5.4 day, Good Visibility
|
|
< < |
- Beta Persei - Variable Star (Algol Variable), magnitude variation 2.1 - 3.4, period 2.9 day, Good Visibility
|
> > |
- Beta Persei - Variable Star (Algol Variable), magnitude variation 2.1 - 3.4, period 2.9 day, Good Visibility-> eclipsing binary - Not Good
|
|
- Eta Aquila - Variable Star (Cephid Variable), magnitude variation 3.5 - 4.4, period 7.2 day, Poor Visibility
- RR Lyrae - Variable Star (RR Lyrae Variable) magnitude variation 7.06 - 8.12, period 0.6 day, Good Visibilty
- TU Cassiopeia - Variable Star (Cephid Variable) magnitude variation 6.88 - 8.18, period 2.14 day, Good Visibilty
|
|
< < |
- RZ CAssiopeia - Variable Star (Cephid Variable) magnitude variation 6.18 - 7.72, period 1.2 day, Good Visibilty
|
> > |
- RZ Cassiopeia - Variable Star (Algol Variable) magnitude variation 6.18 - 7.72, period 1.2 day, Good Visibilty- > eclipsing binary - Not Good
|
|
- AB Auriga - Variable Star (Tau Tauri Variable) magnitude variation 6.3 - 8.4, period 6.5 day (Eruptive - but period given by AAVSO), Good Visibilty,
- W Gemini - Variable Star (Delta Cephei Variable) magnitude variation 6.54 - 7.38, period 7.9 day, Good Visibilty (although rises at 19:00),
Data and Logs |