Tags:
create new tag
view all tags

20120525 Sig Ey M2 Dependence Data Analysis

  • How accurately do we need to know M2?

Horizontal Fitting

  • Need accurate horizontal measurement of the electron beam to fix that parameter in the fit.
  • Horizontal measurement from the same shift in file 20120522_0258_lws.dat
  • Not entirely compete, but reasonable.

  • Horizontal Fit Charge Normalised Only:

20120522_0258_lws_xy_fit_plot.png

Horizontal Chamber Scan - Charge Normalised Only

20120522_0258_lws_xy_fit_plot1.png

Horizontal Chamber Scan - Charge & Laser PD Normalised

  • These fits both indicate a horizontal size of around 235um. This is inline with the OTR measurement that was 230 (don't have exact value).

  • Use 235um for horizontal size in fits.

Fitting

Use 20120522_0548 as a sample data file. It was taken at QM14FF = -88.26A - the nominal setting in the quad scan at the end of the shift on 20120522. This may not be the smallest scan, but it is suitable for fitting.

  • Fix m2, e_x=230um, amplitude, offset, centre, e_y free

M^2 e_y (sigma) Chi^2 Centre Offset Amplitude Plot Filename
1.0 1.30 +- 0.3 (1) 53.32 848.998 +- 3 3.59 +- 0.10 2.60 +- 0.10 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot1.pdf
1.1 1.18 +- 0.21 53.56 849.011 +- 0.14 3.59 +- 0.01 2.61 +- 0.08 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot2.pdf
1.2 1.11 +- 0.23 53.56 849.011 +- 0.14 3.59 +- 0.01 2.61 +- 0.08 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot3.pdf
1.3 0.99 +- 0.3 (1) 53.56 849.011 +- 3 3.59 +- 0.01 2.61 +- 0.08 None
1.4 0.73 +- 0.4 (1) 53.88 849.011 +- 3 3.59 +- 0.10 2.64 +- 0.10 None
1.5 0.76 +- 0.33 53.56 849.011 +- 0.14 3.59 +- 0.01 2.61 +- 0.08 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot4.pdf
1.6 0.69 +- 0.4 (1) 53.37 849.011 +- 3 3.59 +- 0.10 2.59 +- 0.10 None
1.7 0.44 +- 0.4 (1) 53.33 849.011 +- 3 3.59 +- 0.10 2.59 +- 0.10 None

  • (1) Minuit did not converge on this - 'inversion of matrix fails' - used last values - errors estimated

Plots

Below are some of the plots from the fits that converged.

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot2.png

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot2.pdf

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot3.png

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot3.pdf

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot4.png

20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot4.pdf

Sumamry

The M2 directly determines the measured size of the electron beam as they are both of a similar size. Obviously, there are further questions as to the validity of using the M2 model, but in the meantime, it clearly determines our main results. Below, the ratio of the laser size to the quadrature sum as a function of laser size with the electron beam size fixed at 1um is shown.

20120525_0045_convolution_ratio.png

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng 20120522_0258_lws_xy_fit_plot.png r1 manage 54.9 K 24 May 2012 - 15:30 LaurieNevay Horizontal Fit Charge Normalised Only
PNGpng 20120522_0258_lws_xy_fit_plot1.png r1 manage 56.8 K 24 May 2012 - 15:31 LaurieNevay Horizontal Fit Charge & Laser PD Normalised
PNGpng 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot2.png r1 manage 47.7 K 24 May 2012 - 16:16 LaurieNevay Fit Plot2
PNGpng 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot3.png r1 manage 47.8 K 24 May 2012 - 16:17 LaurieNevay Fit Plot3
PNGpng 20120522_0548_lws_xy_fit_plot4.png r1 manage 47.8 K 24 May 2012 - 16:17 LaurieNevay Fit Plot4
PNGpng 20120525_0045_convolution_ratio.png r2 r1 manage 19.7 K 24 May 2012 - 17:05 LaurieNevay  

Physics WebpagesRHUL WebpagesCampus Connect • Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX; Tel/Fax +44 (0)1784 434455/437520

Topic revision: r1 - 24 May 2012 - LaurieNevay

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback