Tags:
create new tag
view all tags

20130212 Function for Vertical Alignment

Currently there is not fitting function for the vertical alignment scans using the OTR screen. This could be calculated using an overlap integral if a function was made to describe the screen. This would only be an approximation though as the notch in the screen does not have a well defined shape due to its origins. An easier solution is to use a generic function - as long as it is repeatable and consistent. This should be better than judging by eye. Below is a typical vertical chamber scan with the OTR screen set to the laser focus position - laser off during this. Wire-scanner detector used as much more scattering when a solid target is used - would saturate the laser-wire detector.

20130208_0149_lws_xy_errbar_plot7.png

For this, a generalised logistic function was used. It is described by (taken from wikipedia):

6f2f898447173ea8f33d0cc427d1ea97.png

with the following definitions:

  • A: the lower asymptote
  • K: the upper asymptote. If A=0 then K is called the carrying capacity
  • B: the growth rate
  • v;>0 : affects near which asymptote maximum growth occurs.
  • Q: depends on the value Y(0)
  • M: the time of maximum growth if Q=ν

This function was simulated to ascertain the best values to use and which parameters should be fixed - with a 6 parameter fit you can get anything so with the general shape know, it should be possible to limit this down a bit. In each case the other parameters were fixed at the values found from a free 6 parameter fit. The apparent uncertainty in the fit details is just the initial set size supplied to minuit for that parameter.

v Dependence Q Dependence
v_dependence.png q_dependence.png
Q Dependence Zoomed B Dependence
q_dependence_zoomed.png b_dependence.png

In the end, the following set of parameters was chosen:

Wiki Name Fixed Value Lower Limit Upper Limit
A No NA -0.5 16000
K No NA 0 16000
B No NA 0.00001 0.5
v No NA 0 40
Q Yes 20.0 NA NA
M No NA NA NA

Here A is the offset, K is the ceiling and M is the approximate middle. It still has to be determined how stable this is and what the fudge factor is between the fitted M and the point were laser-wire collisions are found.

20130208_0149_lws_xy_fit_plot6.png

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng 20130208_0149_lws_xy_errbar_plot7.png r1 manage 30.7 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:35 LaurieNevay typical scan
PNGpng 20130208_0149_lws_xy_fit_plot6.png r1 manage 49.5 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:37 LaurieNevay fitted
PNGpng 6f2f898447173ea8f33d0cc427d1ea97.png r1 manage 1.4 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:34 LaurieNevay equation
PNGpng b_dependence.png r1 manage 93.8 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:37 LaurieNevay b dependance
PNGpng q_dependence.png r1 manage 69.8 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:36 LaurieNevay q dependance
PNGpng q_dependence_zoomed.png r1 manage 90.1 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:36 LaurieNevay q dependance zoomed
PNGpng v_dependence.png r1 manage 103.6 K 14 Feb 2013 - 09:36 LaurieNevay v dependance

Physics WebpagesRHUL WebpagesCampus Connect • Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX; Tel/Fax +44 (0)1784 434455/437520

Topic revision: r1 - 14 Feb 2013 - LaurieNevay

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback