create new tag
view all tags

20130228 Laser Energy Meter Comparison

SLink energy meter arrived back from recalibration. Also, it's externally triggered so it should be better. However, last time we observed that it missed quite a few pulses even when externally triggered. Just now, a handheld meter is used that isn't triggered, but the laser is more reliable than the slink so it's not too much of a problem. I asked about the triggering issues, but like their detector, Gentec seemed unresponsive.

  • Use caEventRate on ip:laserenergy. Leave until 6th iteration - around 5 minutes total averaging time. Do three times for comparison.

  • extlw:cherenkov 3.12 +- 0.07Hz, 3.12 +- 0.08Hz, 3.11 +- 0.07Hz

For a trigger, I used the lab table camera trigger as it's easily identifiable, goes to the right place and is independent - ie no other things use that gate generator. Originally set to 'THRU' for camera as camera can add its own delay. Set to '10MS' on blue gate generator in middle of bottom NIM bin and fiddle screw beside knob to adjust while looking at output on software. Adjust to maximise measured energy.

  • SLink, original method, 2.93 +- 0.49Hz, 2.72 +- 0.23Hz, 2.74 +- 0.26

The SLink spews out zeros as fast as it possibly can - terrible design - and the vi simply evaluates to see which ones are non-zero and if they are, publishes them to the rest of the vi, and therefore to epics. It looks for the number of bytes at the port and reads out only that amount. If it reads out the wrong number, the value could be misinterpreted or missed entirely. Therefore, try a fixed number of bytes - doesn't wait to receive the full number - every time.

  • 500 bytes (guess from monitor its normal readout - no readout at all
  • 600 bytes - works a charm!

  • SLink, fixed byte method, 3.12 +- 0.08, 3.09 +- 0.08Hz, 3.10 +- 0.09

Also, laser was still warming up while I started this, but seems to be close to the right temperature now - 87.1, 87.3 ideal. However, it seems really quite stable since the tuning to the seed made it more stable.

  • 100 pulse log to record this performance 20130228_1457_log.dat
  • Values are automagically multiplied in analysis software because use of an attenuator is assumed. Real values approx 16mJ here
  • Energy: 76.36 +- 0.77mJ -> around 1% stability - this is almost too good - will verify with handheld energy meter
  • I did check selecting different pulses and the energy did change as well as blocking the laser and reading out zero several times...
  • Energy meter readouts out 16.4 +- 0.3mJ - around 1.9% so not too dissimilar.

Energy Readings using Slink


Current Method - Solo2 Handheld beside chamber

Ran laser downstairs and up to high energy (as it has attenuator on it). Tweaked up green while I was doing this anyway.

  • Solo2 handheld, 3.07 +- 0.10, 2.98 +- 0.45, 3.06 +- 0.12, 2.98 +- 0.44

Try setting trigger level to 3.0% vs 1.0% before.

  • Solo2 handheld, 2.98 +- 0.23, 2.96 +- 0.20, 3.05 +- 0.05, 3.04 +- 0.09

Ok, seems to be a little better, but it doesn't trigger if the laser drops out and the value is just repeated in the data because the PV never updates. Also, it crashes about once every two hours - more so recently - bringing up a serial read error. Simply clicking ok makes it continue without crashing fully so seems a bit of a stupid error if it can keep going.

It would seem better to install the SLink to measure the energy.

Also, with Solo2 handheld meter, checked syncrhonicity / latency. It's about 120ms on average which should mean that it's caught at the right time in our data as the cbpms are usually 150ms after extlw:cherenkov. However, it is close.

Solo2 Handheld meter publishing times


Take 1000 pulse log while changing laser energy to get better correlation.


Actually, this isn't such a good way to do things. Changed scanning script to include laser - woo!

Laser Energy vs Flash Lamp Delay Laser Photodiode vs Laser Energy
20130228_1728_lws_xy_errbar_plot.png 20130228_1728_lws_xy_errbar_plot1.png

But we really need is energy as a function of laser photodiode to linearise the laser photodiode signal. Still need to come up with a function for this that can be reliably fitted.


Anyway, this isn't too bad just now, but should be even better with the SLink energy meter.

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng 20130228_1457_log_y_hist3.png r1 manage 23.2 K 28 Feb 2013 - 06:06 LaurieNevay Energy Readings using Slink
PNGpng 20130228_1554_log_xy_scatter_plot.png r1 manage 41.6 K 28 Feb 2013 - 08:41 LaurieNevay Log Version
PNGpng 20130228_1728_lws_xy_errbar_plot.png r1 manage 27.4 K 28 Feb 2013 - 08:37 LaurieNevay Laser Energy vs Flash Lamp Delay
PNGpng 20130228_1728_lws_xy_errbar_plot1.png r1 manage 29.4 K 28 Feb 2013 - 08:38 LaurieNevay Laser Photodiode vs Laser Energy
PNGpng 20130228_1728_lws_xy_errbar_plot2.png r1 manage 27.6 K 28 Feb 2013 - 08:43 LaurieNevay Laser PD function
PNGpng 20130228_laser_meter.png r1 manage 143.1 K 28 Feb 2013 - 06:52 LaurieNevay Solo2 Handheld meter publishing times
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions

Physics WebpagesRHUL WebpagesCampus Connect • Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX; Tel/Fax +44 (0)1784 434455/437520

Topic revision: r2 - 28 Feb 2013 - LaurieNevay

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback