Laser Normalisation for Fitting
Compare the effect of background subtraction and laser energy normalisation for fitting. Neither the accuracy or precision of the laser energy measurement is sufficient to improve the normalised signal (hypothesis).
Charge normalised
Fitted values are:
Reduced Chi2: 4.14615 |
sigma_ex: 124.874 +2.12956 -2.11568 |
sigma_ey: 1.43039 +0.0543083 -0.054307 |
dx0: 206.36 +3.6964 -3.70271 |
dy0: 760.95 +0.0366295 -0.0364225 |
offset: 0.747667 +0.0110486 -0.0110642 |
amplitude: 10.3483 +0.11383 -0.11319 |
Charge normalised background subtracted
Fitted values are:
Reduced Chi2: 4.14615 |
sigma_ex: 124.872 +2.13111 -2.11412 |
sigma_ey: 1.43038 +0.0543183 -0.0542969 |
dx0: 206.348 +3.70816 -3.69089 |
dy0: 760.95 +0.0365984 -0.0364532 |
offset: 0.104667 +0.0110485 -0.0110643 |
amplitude: 10.3483 +0.113837 -0.113182 |
Charge normalised background subtracted len
Fitted values are:
Reduced Chi2: 4.72921 |
sigma_ex: 124.17 +2.14108 -2.12945 |
sigma_ey: 1.44897 +0.0532012 -0.0531334 |
dx0: 205.404 +3.7663 -3.75842 |
dy0: 760.967 +0.0360184 -0.0359157 |
offset: 1.29471 +0.14225 -0.142511 |
amplitude: 133.062 +1.45495 -1.44628 |
Charge normalised background subtracted lpn
Fitted values are:
Reduced Chi2: 6.36996 |
sigma_ex: 110.207 +2.14836 -2.13408 |
sigma_ey: 1.51045 +0.0640568 -0.0637409 |
dx0: 202.432 +3.95782 -3.93806 |
dy0: 760.82 +0.0406612 -0.0406095 |
offset: 1.53377 +0.145307 -0.14555 |
amplitude: 134.91 +1.96614 -1.94926 |
--
LaurieNevay - 26 Sep 2013