JC: I have investigated the aperture size using a test image of the Double cluster. I chose an appropriate test frame such that there were at least two stars 'close together'. This was required in order to establish a reasonable upper limit on aperture size as it was observed larger apertures increase the likelyhood of including more than one star in any given aperture. pixel_sum_v_hw_double_cluster.png - It is observed that for all stars, the sum of pixel values within each aperture reaches an almost constant value after subtracting the median background value per pixel. This background value was calculated individually for each star using the immediate pixels surrounding each aperture. These boxes used to calculate the star-specific background value may include other stars themsevles however this will not dramatically effect calculations in most cases as it is the medial pixel value that is used as a background value. column_hist_double_cluster.pngrow_hist_double_cluster.pngHere are both the row and column pixel sum projections with the overall median background level indicated in orange. star_locate_double_cluster.png -And here is a plot of the detected star apertures shown in red. The blue box indicated the square area used.


I continued to develop the star finder algorithm, in particular calculating the baricenter of each star, the flux and the magnitude.

Here I attach a plot of the stars found by the algorithm; their baricenter is identified with a dot.

I also calculated the error in the baricenter. However, it cannot be seen because too small. I also attach a zoom in to prove that error bars are actually there.

The values for each quantity are listed in this table.

To do:

  • calculate the error in the flux and in the magnitude.
  • plot the measured magnitude vs the published value.



In addition, I investigated further some old part of the project, like the dark analysis (analysis of dark frames), the background analysis (how the mean value of the background changes while moving in the x and y direction) and how to compute b_ij (which I still need to perfectionate).

As I feel like we should not go back and forth over the different topics of the project, I will avoid to put any information relative to that here, as it might be confusing later. If necessary and requested I will be happy to discuss it next time.

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng Schermata_2019-01-24_alle_16.20.58.png r1 manage 59.9 K 24 Jan 2019 - 16:34 AriannaSaba  
PNGpng Schermata_2019-01-24_alle_16.35.00.png r1 manage 27.4 K 24 Jan 2019 - 16:35 AriannaSaba  
PNGpng back_plot_double_cluster.png r1 manage 20.7 K 24 Jan 2019 - 09:21 JacobChambers  
PNGpng column_hist_double_cluster.png r1 manage 40.6 K 24 Jan 2019 - 09:22 JacobChambers  
PNGpng pixel_sum_v_hw_double_cluster.png r1 manage 95.1 K 24 Jan 2019 - 09:21 JacobChambers  
PNGpng row_hist_double_cluster.png r1 manage 40.6 K 24 Jan 2019 - 09:22 JacobChambers  
PNGpng star_locate_double_cluster.png r1 manage 14.5 K 24 Jan 2019 - 09:22 JacobChambers  
PNGpng stars.png r1 manage 15.9 K 24 Jan 2019 - 16:34 AriannaSaba  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions

Physics WebpagesRHUL WebpagesCampus Connect • Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX; Tel/Fax +44 (0)1784 434455/437520

Topic revision: r4 - 24 Jan 2019 - AriannaSaba

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding RHUL Physics Department TWiki? Send feedback