401x401
Other profile taken of same star with less saturation, fwhm calculated.
Different star in same image used, it's less bright, but not saturated.
Then, I used took a profile of a star in the simulated star field
| I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
231117Shape_test_9.png | r1 | manage | 910.0 K | 24 Nov 2017 - 01:30 | RebekahChafer1 | Latest simulated image |
| |
Alpha10bk301box.png | r1 | manage | 16.4 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:23 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
Alpha10bk401box.png | r1 | manage | 14.8 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 22:41 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
BrightestSortOfSaturated.png | r1 | manage | 37.0 K | 24 Nov 2017 - 01:22 | RebekahChafer1 | Profile of brightest star - slightly off-centre, sort of saturated |
| |
SaturatedImage.png | r1 | manage | 27.5 K | 24 Nov 2017 - 01:22 | RebekahChafer1 | Profile of brightest star - plateaued at peak |
| |
Simulated_Data.png | r1 | manage | 35.1 K | 24 Nov 2017 - 01:23 | RebekahChafer1 | Star from simulated star field profile |
| |
StarProfileObs1_noSaturation.png | r1 | manage | 34.1 K | 24 Nov 2017 - 01:23 | RebekahChafer1 | Profile of different star - less bright, but not saturated |
| |
appature_sum.png | r1 | manage | 19.9 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:24 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
centre.png | r1 | manage | 20.7 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:37 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
centre_zoom.PNG | r1 | manage | 4.9 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:37 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
num.PNG | r1 | manage | 0.7 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:57 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
sim2.PNG | r1 | manage | 235.9 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:54 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
sim2cen.png | r1 | manage | 16.3 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:55 | LunaMarieBorella1 | |
| |
sim2find.png | r1 | manage | 13.6 K | 23 Nov 2017 - 21:54 | LunaMarieBorella1 |