Shape function fixed to be more realistic. Adds the effect of an unfocused image.
Also, a globular option was implemented.
Tested the ability of the star finding algorithm with dense star fields

The sigma for these two stars when using two separate sigma parameters in fit are 8.987 and 9.072, which corresponds to a size of 5.47'' and 5.52''. In comparison, the FWHM corresponds to 6.51''.
This was repeated for real data
The sigma for these stars are 1.8413 and 1.8473 pixels, which correspond to a size of 1.12'' and 1.13''. | I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Accept-reject_monte_carlo_Stot_Skewed_distribution.png | r1 | manage | 82.0 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 18:23 | RebekahChafer1 | Stot Distribution |
| |
Analysis_of_Density_of_Stars.png | r1 | manage | 63.3 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:06 | RebekahChafer1 | Plot of Counted Stars versus true number of stars |
| |
Globular_Simulation.png | r1 | manage | 4.1 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 21:07 | RebekahChafer1 | |
| |
Profile_of_Multiple_Simulated_Stars.png | r1 | manage | 32.4 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:11 | RebekahChafer1 | Profile of multiple stars from simulated data |
| |
RealDataMultiple_stars.png | r1 | manage | 33.1 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:17 | RebekahChafer1 | Profile of multiple stars from real data |
| |
Star_Density_Analysis.png | r1 | manage | 65.2 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:03 | RebekahChafer1 | Plot of density of star field versus the difference between counted stars and true value |
| |
Unfocused_Image.png | r1 | manage | 17.8 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:00 | RebekahChafer1 | Simulated unfocused star field |
| |
ZoomedIn.png | r1 | manage | 29.3 K | 30 Nov 2017 - 22:12 | RebekahChafer1 | Zoomed in image of dimmer star from graph |